BRITISH KENNEL CLUB: “WE LEAVE IT TO THE JUDGES”

freddemo3
October 21, 2014. Location: The Thistle Hotel, Penny Lane Haydock, Merseyside. Occasion: Kennel Club Question Time, meaning to involve people with The Kennel Club.  “It is also an ideal opportunity to meet the senior management of the Kennel Club and to understand when and why decisions are made – and have the opportunity to influence these decisions.”

Since The Kennel Club has refused to respond to my Open Letter, it seemed to be a perfect opportunity to ask the senior management about the dilute problem. Which we did. Professor Steve Dean (Chairman) and Caroline Kisko (Kennel Club Secretary and Communications Director) would be answering our questions.

Our question was: “What is the KC’s stance on the silver question and why are the KC registering dilutes?”
Professor Steve Dean didn’t know where to look, so Caroline Kisko took the microphone. Her reply comes down to the following: “A Labrador is a Labrador, whether it’s yellow, silver or pink. So they can be registered by the Kennel Club and entered in a show. Hopefully they will be binned by the judge, because they don’t meet the breed standard, as they would with a Lab who doesn’t meet the standard in any way. (…) Some people want these non-recognised colours.”
With regard to health tests she made clear that “We are the Registry and we will register any pups from KC registered parents, regardless of whether the parents are affected for a disease, or have say 30/30 hips. It’s up to the buyer to work out whether the test results are OK or not.”

It became clear to us that The Kennel Club is a commercial enterprise, with no interest whatsoever in the purity of the studbook or the future of the Labrador breed. They’re deaf and blind for the fact that the Labrador breed is increasingly being fouled with diluted mixed breeds from the United States. They refuse to demand a simple DNA test on the dilution allele, when it comes to imported Labradors. Such a test could prove if a Labrador is dilute-free  or not, in other words if a Labrador is purebred or not.

It was an ideal opportunity to meet the senior management of the Kennel Club and to understand when and why decisions are made. It should have been the opportunity to influence these decisions. However, this only seems to be possible as long as there’s no money, love for the Labrador breed, or common sense involved.

The Kennel Club’s stance on this problem is extremely disappointing. Let’s hope that the Labrador Breed Council will be able to turn the tide.

Jack Vanderwyk,
October 2014

Further reading:

– Open Letter to The Kennel Club (U.K.)

– The Kennel Club – J’accuse!

– SHAME ON YOU, U.K. KENNEL CLUB !

– The Role of the Labrador Breed Council in the Dilute Controversy

– The Kennel Club’s Approach Of The Dilute Problem

– History of Dilutes in the United Kingdom – 1. The Bridgeview Connection

– History of Dilutes in the United Kingdom – 2. The Dreamcoat connection

Advertisements

About Jack Vanderwyk

Hey! What am I like! :-)
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to BRITISH KENNEL CLUB: “WE LEAVE IT TO THE JUDGES”

  1. susan anne booth says:

    The Kennel Cub lost sight of its true reason for existence a long time ago. The dog world today has changed and is sadly a just a big money making industry, not least for the KC. I hope there are enough really dedicated breeders now and in the future who will stringently dedicate themselves to breeding the true and pure Labrador Retriever. With the help of the database and DNA, it wont be impossible.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s